Rome premiered on HBO on August 28, 2005, running for 2 seasons (22 episodes) through 2007. This lavish historical drama, a co-production with the BBC, transports viewers to the last days of the Roman Republic.
What makes it special? The series centers on two fictional soldiers – Lucius Vorenus and Titus Pullo – caught up in real events like Julius Caesar's rise and the ensuing power struggles. Without revealing any spoilers, Rome offers a rich tapestry of political intrigue, warfare, and family drama set against authentic ancient backdrops.
Why it endures: Praised for its cinematic production values and compelling characters, the show has often been cited as one of HBO's golden-age classics. In this Rome review, we explore how the series blends fact and fiction into an engrossing saga, and why it remains a benchmark for historical television storytelling.
Rome earns a perfect 5/5 on our woke scale, signifying a complete absence of modern intrusions. This series hails from 2005, well before current identity-politics trends, and it shows.
Why it works: The casting and storytelling prioritize historical and narrative authenticity over any social engineering. There are no forced race or gender swaps of historical figures – Romans are depicted as Romans, with no anachronistic diversity insertions that would feel out of place in 1st century BC.
Authentic character portrayals: Female characters like Atia and Servilia wield influence through cunning and social standing (true to the era) rather than ahistorical physical prowess. The show's focus is on truthfully portraying the power dynamics and culture of ancient Rome, not lecturing the audience.
You won't find any preachy messaging or tokenism here. Rome simply tells a great story rooted in history, earning it a full marks anti-woke badge.
Rome painstakingly recreates the late Republican era with an obsessive attention to detail. The world-building is immediately immersive – from the muddy streets of the Subura to the marble halls of the Senate, every setting feels lived-in and period-accurate.
The production famously built expansive sets at Rome's Cinecittà Studios, allowing the camera to roam through bustling markets and temples that convey the gritty reality of ancient life. Unlike shows that retrofit history with modern sensibilities, leans into the authentic customs and culture of its time.
We see Roman rituals, elections, and military encampments depicted with a realism that doubles as a history lesson. The writers incorporate real Latin phrases and references (Cicero's oratory and legionary slang) to enrich the texture without ever turning it into a dry documentary.
The balance: Of course, some dramatic license is taken – compressing timelines or imagining personal lives – but it's done so gracefully that the fiction and facts meld seamlessly.
By balancing scholarly research with cinematic storytelling, Rome achieves a rare feat: it feels like stepping into a time machine, offering entertainment and education in equal measure.
The heart of Rome lies in its characters, both historical legends and fictional everymen, brought to life by outstanding performances. Central to the story is the unlikely friendship between Lucius Vorenus and Titus Pullo – a stern, honor-bound centurion and a rowdy, big-hearted legionary.
Their brotherly bond, tested by war and politics, provides the emotional core of the series and is portrayed with depth and authenticity by Kevin McKidd and Ray Stevenson.
Key performance highlights:
Even supporting roles shine: Lindsay Duncan's grieving, vengeful Servilia, Tobias Menzies's conflicted Brutus, and David Bamber's proud Cicero all leave strong impressions.
Character arcs in Rome are richly drawn, showing growth or downfall in organic ways. This focus on psychological realism – aided by the cast's top-tier acting – makes the ancient personalities relatable and keeps viewers deeply invested in their fates.
Beneath its bloody battles and political maneuvers, Rome is fundamentally a study of power and its consequences. The series deftly explores how great events turn on personal decisions and relationships.
The show explores four key themes:
We witness how loyalty to friends often clashes with duties to the Republic or family, creating heartbreaking dilemmas. The cost of ambition is a recurring idea – pursuit of power leaves a trail of broken alliances and moral compromises.
Moments of humanity: Yet, amidst the cynicism, there are moments celebrating friendship, duty, and even love (the devotion of Vorenus's family, Antony's passion for Cleopatra) that provide humanity against the backdrop of war and conspiracy.
Rome manages to balance these themes without heavy-handedness, making the audience ponder how personal virtues and vices can shape the course of history – all while being thoroughly entertained by the drama at hand.
Rome is often heralded as HBO's high-budget marvel, and for good reason. The production quality is cinematic, rivaling feature films of its time.
Visually, the series embraces a gritty realism – the color palette is rich in earthy tones (dusty browns, sun-baked golds, blood reds), immersing us in a world of ancient stone and soil. The cinematography stands out with its sweeping shots of Roman forums and intimate handheld camerawork in cramped slums or battlefields.
The costume design and set design are lavish and painstakingly authentic: from the ornate togas of senators to the battered armor of legionaries, every element feels real and worn. This commitment earned Rome multiple Emmy Awards for art direction, costumes, and visual effects.
Notably, the battles (like Caesar's campaign in Gaul or the Civil War confrontations) are staged with visceral impact despite not always showing massive armies – clever editing and choreography convey the chaos of war without endless CGI. When violence erupts, it's brutal and unflinching, consistent with the era's harshness.
The music: The musical score by Jeff Beal complements the visuals with a haunting, percussive quality that evokes antiquity.
Overall, Rome's technical excellence and style draw viewers fully into its world, making 52 B.C. feel both alien and tangible – a place of beauty and squalor captured in equal measure by the camera's eye.
The writing in Rome balances the needs of historical narrative with the engagement of personal storytelling.
The dialogue is a highlight: it's sharp and memorable, tailored to each social strata. Senators and generals speak with Shakespearean formality and rhetoric (Cicero's speeches and Caesar's proclamations carry weighty eloquence), while soldiers and plebeians curse and banter in more blunt, colloquial language.
Why it works: This contrast gives the show linguistic texture and often humor – for instance, Pullo's frequent expletives or rough-hewn jokes lighten the tone in otherwise dark moments.
Importantly, Rome avoids dumping exposition awkwardly; instead, it reveals the political stakes through natural conversations and events, trusting the audience to follow along.
Season pacing differences: The pacing of the series is generally excellent in Season 1: it takes its time establishing characters and the complex web of alliances over the course of Caesar's civil war. In Season 2, the pace accelerates – partly because the creators had to condense planned storylines when the series wasn't renewed beyond two seasons.
Despite this compression, the narrative remains coherent and gripping; it's a testament to the writers that even a telescoped storyline still resonates emotionally.
Script quality: Even so, the script quality remains high throughout – full of intrigue, dark humor, and powerful character moments. Episodes are structured to deliver both political high drama and intimate turning points, often ending on notes that leave you desperate to watch the next.
Rome debuted to strong critical acclaim and solid viewership, quickly proving that a big-budget historical series could captivate adult audiences.
It won 7 Emmy Awards in technical categories (recognizing its superlative costumes, sets, and cinematography) and earned a loyal fan following. Although its high production costs led to only two seasons (cutting short what was envisioned as a five-season arc), the series did not fade into obscurity.
Instead, Rome has grown in esteem over the years as a cult classic and a touchstone for the genre. Many viewers now regard it as one of the best historical dramas ever made – a trailblazer that arguably paved the way for later epics like Game of Thrones.
Cultural impact: The show's influence is seen in how subsequent period pieces strive for gritty realism and complex characters rather than the sanitized, stagey feel of earlier sword-and-sandal epics.
Rome also proved that audiences appreciate historical accuracy: fans and scholars alike have praised its depiction of Roman life (the series is even used as a teaching tool in some history classes, albeit with disclaimers for its dramatic license and R-rated elements).
In the realm of pop culture, Rome left us with indelible character portrayals – Ciarán Hinds's Caesar and James Purefoy's Mark Antony are often ranked among the definitive screen versions of those figures.
The legacy: Rome's reputation stands unblemished; if anything, it's burnished by nostalgia for a time when HBO's brand meant uncompromising quality. The show's legacy is that of a golden age masterpiece that still feels relevant and thrilling.
Rome is more than just a TV show – it's a time capsule to an era of both history and television that we often reminisce about. With its overall rating of 9.20/10, this series ranks as an absolute classic in The Att's book.
Why it's exceptional: It exemplifies the best of HBO's early 2000s golden age, standing proudly alongside The Sopranos and The Wire in terms of storytelling ambition and production excellence. Crucially, it achieves this without the crutches of modern pandering: Rome is refreshingly free of today's trendy agendas, allowing viewers to be fully absorbed in its story and characters.
We wholeheartedly recommend Rome to anyone who loves historical epics, political thrillers, or just damn good storytelling. It's especially gratifying for those seeking an immersive drama unspoiled by revisionist history.
Be prepared for graphic violence and adult themes (this is HBO, after all), but also prepare to be awed by the level of detail and heart in the narrative.
In the end, Rome endures as an epic saga that entertains and enlightens in equal measure. It reminds us that when it comes to great television, Roma victor – quality conquers all.
Rome remains victorious as one of the medium's crowning achievements, delivering an experience that engages the mind and senses – from the clamor of battle to the whispers of a Senate conspiracy.