MobLand: Tom Hardy Makes the Trouble Worth Watching
Updated
Tom Hardy does a lot of work for MobLand. Some of it is the obvious work of playing a man employed to resolve dangerous problems. The rest is keeping me interested when the writing around him starts making those problems harder to believe.
I enjoyed the first season, with reservations. There is enough tension and enough presence in the cast to make it worth watching if British gangster drama is your sort of thing. I would not put it ahead of the best shows in that category. The dialogue, accents and character decisions can all ask for more goodwill than they ought to.
Hardy supplies much of that goodwill as Harry Da Souza, a fixer working for the Harrigan crime family. He has the air of somebody who would prefer a clear instruction and a manageable problem. The family is not especially good at providing either. Watching him try to impose some order on their behaviour is the most reliable attraction.
The person who has to answer the phone
Harry's job gives the series a useful point of entry. He is close enough to the family to understand its habits, but he is also the person expected to turn those habits into something survivable. Somebody else can indulge an impulse. Harry has to deal with what follows.
Tom Hardy makes that distinction convincing. He doesn't need to announce how capable Harry is in every scene. The attention he gives to a conversation, and the sense that he is assessing what has not been said, do more than a string of threats would.
I like the relative restraint. Around louder people, a performance that holds something back becomes especially watchable. Harry can make a scene feel dangerous without behaving as though he is auditioning to be the most dangerous man in it.
There are limits to what an actor can repair, but Hardy is an unusually good reason to stay with uneven material. When the plot starts straining, I am still interested in how he will handle the next encounter.
Working for the Harrigans looks exhausting
Pierce Brosnan and Helen Mirren play Conrad and Maeve Harrigan. They give the family an immediate weight, although I find the performances less consistently convincing than Hardy's. The more theatrical exchanges can tip from menace into something much broader.
The accents are part of that problem for me. I notice the performance of a voice when I would rather be listening to the person using it. Combined with an overworked line, that can pull me out of a scene quite quickly.
Paddy Considine, as Kevin, is a welcome presence. There is something useful in a performer who can suggest discomfort without making a display of it. The family benefits from having more than one register available.
The basic arrangement has plenty of potential: power concentrated among people whose personal behaviour makes exercising it difficult. MobLand doesn't always trust that to be interesting enough on its own. Sometimes a smaller disagreement would carry more weight than another elaborate demonstration of how formidable somebody is.
A bad decision still needs a reason
Gangster stories need reckless people. I am not asking everyone to make sensible choices or for a criminal family to operate like a well-run office. Pride, fear and resentment are often the whole reason a situation becomes interesting.
What I need is to understand why this particular person makes this particular mistake. MobLand is uneven there. At times a decision feels driven by the need to create the next confrontation, rather than by what has been established about the person making it.
The same applies to competence. A character can be very capable, but the show should give me enough to believe in that capability. Simply arranging the scene so that everybody else becomes less effective is not a satisfying substitute.
These are not problems in every episode or every exchange. There are stretches where the pressure builds well and the reactions feel proportionate. That makes the weaker passages more frustrating: the series can do the convincing version, and I would like it to do that more consistently.
Harry has a home to get back to
Joanne Froggatt, as Harry's wife Jan, gives the story a perspective that the gangland conversations cannot provide. His work may be absorbing to watch, but it is also something another person has to live around.
Those scenes are useful because they ask a different question of him. Being effective in a dangerous room is not the same as being available at home. A problem cannot always be settled by reading the threat correctly or deciding what somebody wants.
I don't need the domestic material to turn Harry into a misunderstood innocent. It is more interesting when his choices remain his responsibility. The contrast lets the performance show something beyond professional control, without requiring a lengthy speech to explain the man.
There is room for more of that texture. The series has a strong central actor and a premise that naturally puts competing demands on him. Its quieter relationships can make the louder trouble matter more, provided they are allowed to feel like relationships rather than pauses in the action.
Enjoyable, even when I can see the joins
MobLand has a polished, confident surface. The expensive surroundings and the criminal business sit comfortably together, and the series generally knows how to present a confrontation. Guy Ritchie's involvement gives it an obvious association with a particular kind of British crime entertainment.
That association is not enough to carry the writing, though. I don't want every conversation to sound as if it has been prepared for a trailer. A threat becomes less impressive if everyone speaks in the same heavily underlined manner.
The most effective passages tend to give Hardy something practical to do and let the tension emerge from the people involved. The less effective ones seem determined to insist on the atmosphere. I can already see that the situation is unpleasant; another flourish will not necessarily make it more convincing.
Despite those complaints, I kept finding reasons to enjoy it. A good lead performance can make a familiar setup feel worth revisiting. I am willing to overlook some clumsiness here, though I wouldn't mistake that willingness for an absence of flaws.
One for the gangster-drama shelf, not its top spot
If you have already watched the stronger crime series and want another, MobLand is worth considering. Go in for Hardy and the family conflict, with some tolerance for uneven dialogue and questionable decisions. That is a fairer expectation than arriving ready to place it among the greats.
The first season gives me enough to be interested, but not enough to recommend it without qualification. I want tighter reasoning from the characters and fewer lines that draw attention to themselves. The foundations are there. Whether the show uses them well is more important than how impressive the cast list looks.
The Sopranos and Gomorrah would come first if you have not seen them. Peaky Blinders is another much stronger recommendation, with the added pleasure of Hardy in a very different role. Kin is a useful comparison for crime organised around family relationships.
UK viewing: Current UK listings include Paramount+ and Prime Video, checked 13 September 2026. Check the specific subscription or purchase option before watching.
Keep Reading
More Reviews You Might Like
Top 10 Gangster Shows Told From Inside the Family
Ten gangster dramas I recommend for their characters, family loyalties and criminal worlds, from The Sopranos and Gomorrah to Kin and MobLand.
Read review
Severance review: the horror of never leaving work
My spoiler-free Severance review after finishing season two: why its divided lives, performances and unsettling office made me rate it more highly.
Read review
Absentia review: a solid thriller carried by Stana Katic
A spoiler-free Absentia review after all three seasons: Stana Katic carries a solid thriller with a convincing central performance and modest ambitions.
Read review
The Big Bang Theory review: brilliant company, terrible flatmates
A highly recommended sitcom, with Jim Parsons, Kaley Cuoco and an excellent ensemble finding comedy in friendship, science and the smallest disagreements.
Read review